This is such an infuriating writing style. There are no actual arguments presented, just click-bait style logical fallacies and half-statements.

Take one of the opening statements: "The myth of remote work being better for productivity has been debunked by many CEOs"

Which is it? Has it been debunked, or do many CEOs disagree with it. What you're (presumably) trying to say is that "many CEOs don't think remote working is better for productivity", or "there is evidence that debunks the myth of productive remote working". You've butchered two things into one, to try and make it pithy and catchy. Instead, it's a car-crash of a sentence that doesn't really mean anything.

And, for the record - I disagree with both.